[Home] - [Online store]
• Home • Tax & Accounting Products • CPE • Customer Training • Tax & Accounting News • Support • Contact Us • About Us • Shop
Locate a Sales Rep
SITE LOGIN/REGISTER CATALOG QUICK SHOP PRODUCT LOGIN

SEC/GAAP Watch - The latest news and developments in accounting, reporting, and disclosure requirements - Stay Informed

SEC/GAAP Watch keeps you informed of the latest developments in accounting, reporting and disclosure requirements. Stay alert to proposed and finalized standards, regulations and agency documentation. Follow us on Twitter.

Click here to receive SEC/GAAP Watch via email.


SEC FASB AICPA PCAOB GASB IASB

SEC

03/17/10 -- SEC Provides Interpretative Guidance on Adviser Custody Rule
As discussed in the article entitled "Interpretative Guidance Posted for Adviser Custody Rule" in the March 16, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC updated its Small Entity Compliance Guide on March 12, 2010, to reflect the December 2009 amendments to Rule 206(4)-2 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

The update reflects the changes to the rule from Release No. IA-2968, Custody of Funds or Securities of Clients by Investment Advisers. The update provides information on the delivery of account statements and notices to clients, surprise examinations, pooled investment vehicles, the definition of custody, qualified custodians, and privately offered securities.

Among other things, the guidance clarifies that the amendments no longer permit an adviser who undergoes an annual surprise examination to send account statements to clients. The statements must now come from the custodian.

Further, the SEC said that an adviser is obligated to have a reasonable basis for believing the custodian sends statements with the addition of a requirement that the reasonable basis be formed after "due inquiry."

03/12/10 -- SEC Updates Its Interpretative Guidance on Adviser Custody Rule
As discussed in the article entitled "FAQs on Adviser Custody Rule Are Updated" in the March 9, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the staff in the SEC’s division of investment management updated its responses to frequently asked questions about the custody requirements in Rule 206(4)-2 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

The responses supersede the previous interpretative guidance on the 2003 changes to the rule to reflect the December 2009 amendments in Release No. IA-2968, Custody of Funds or Securities of Clients by Investment Advisers.

The FAQs include information on compliance dates, account statements, surprise examinations, pooled investment vehicles, and privately offered securities.

The responses are the staff’s views of the rule and are considered interpretative guidance and not SEC regulations.

03/09/10 -- SEC Updates Interpretative Guidance for XBRL Filings
As discussed in the article entitled "Interpretative Guidance for XBRL Filings Is Updated" in the March 5, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC's office of interactive disclosure added interpretative guidance to the frequently asked questions material on the agency's website regarding the preparation of financial statements using the eXtensible Business Reporting Language.

The material was added as Questions 36 through 40 and addresses issues such as having the format of a footnote table in the XBRL document match the original HTML/ASCII file and the use of the pre-defined table structures in the U.S. GAAP taxonomy. The taxonomy is the set of definitions for the tags used to prepare a financial statement in XBRL.

The FAQs are intended to help statement preparers submit financial statements in XBRL, which became a requirement for public companies following the publication of the January 2009 final rule in Release No. 33-9002, Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting.

Separately, the SEC provides small public companies and investors with Interactive Data for Financial Reporting: A Small Entity Compliance Guide. The agency's division of corporation finance also maintains interpretative guidance for XBRL filings in its compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DI) pages.

03/05/10 -- SEC Releases First 2010 Update of Financial Reporting Manual
As discussed in the article entitled "First 2010 Update of Financial Reporting Manual Is Released" in the March 4, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC’s division of corporation finance published the latest edition of its Financial Reporting Manual on March 2.

The updated material in the 325-page document addresses non-GAAP measures of financial performance in Topic 8 and critical accounting estimates related to goodwill impairment in Section 9500.

The manual contains interpretative guidance used by the corporation finance staff, and it covers the financial reporting issues public companies have to address in the documents they submit to the SEC.

When the manual was first posted online in 2008, it concluded a long-running project inside the SEC.

03/03/10 -- SEC Updates Regulation S-K Interpretive Guidance
As discussed in the article entitled "Regulation S-K Interpretive Guidance Is Updated" in the March 2, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC's division of corporation finance recently updated its compliance and disclosure interpretations for Regulation S-K.

The changes include a revision to question 119.16 related to the executive summary compensation table required by Item 402(c)(2)(v) and (vi) of Regulation S-K, and the addition of question 119.24 regarding the application of FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, formerly SFAS No. 123(R). Question 119.24 concerns the application of Topic 718 when a board's compensation committee decides to lower the value of a stock award.

In addition, question 120.03 has been renumbered question 122.04, and question 120.04 has been renumbered question 122.05.

Section 220.01, which deals with the reloading of executive options under FASB ASC 718, was also updated.

The changes also include the deletion of seven questions, mostly related to instructions regarding Item 402.

02/26/10 -- SEC Updates IFRS Roadmap in Release No. 33-9109
As discussed in the article entitled "IFRS Roadmap Is Sidelined for at Least Another Year" in the February 25, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC put its IFRS Roadmap on hold on February 24, telling its staff that more information is needed about the effects global accounting standards will have on U.S. markets before a final decision can be made.

Shortly after announcing the decision, the agency issued Release No. 33-9109, Commission Statement in Support of Convergence and Global Accounting Standards, which essentially reviewed the SEC's actions with regard to IFRS over the past decade and the challenges regulators face in taking their support to the next stage of development. A 44-page appendix to the notice spells out the criteria the staff will use to evaluate the suitability of IFRS for U.S. markets.

By October, the staff in the chief accountant’s office and the division of corporation finance will provide a series of public reports to the commissioners on the progress in reassessing IFRS.

The SEC’s move was approved unanimously by the five commissioners, and senior officials think the agency's staff will be positioned by late 2011 to evaluate the progress on convergence.

02/25/10 -- SEC Issues Money Market Reforms in Release No. IC-29132
As discussed in the article entitled “Money Market Reforms Are Issued in Release No. IC-29132” in the February 24, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently implemented one of its main responses to the credit crisis.

The rule changes issued in Release No. IC-29132, Money Market Fund Reform, become effective May 5. They were approved by the SEC in January.

The changes to the rules that govern money market funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940 will require funds to maintain a portion of their portfolios in instruments that can be readily converted to cash, reducing the maximum weighted average maturity of portfolio holdings, and improving the quality of portfolio securities, the SEC said. The changes are intended to tighten the risk-limiting conditions of Rule 2a-7.

Funds will have to report their portfolio holdings monthly to the SEC. Fund that have repriced below $1 per share, or, in industry parlance broken the buck, will be permitted to suspend shareholder redemptions.

02/23/10 -- SEC Will Discuss IFRS Roadmap at Next Meeting
As discussed in the article entitled "IFRS Roadmap Will Be Discussed at Next Meeting" in the February 22, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC said its next open meeting will include a discussion on whether it should "publish a statement regarding its continued support for a single-set of high-quality globally accepted accounting standards and its ongoing consideration of incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the financial reporting system for U.S. issuers."

The meeting will be the first official discussion the SEC has had on IFRS since Mary Schapiro took over the agency from Christopher Cox, who was a vocal supporter of the global standards. It was on Cox's watch that regulators issued the proposal in Release No. 33-8982, Roadmap for the Potential Use of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards by U.S. Issuers, and a final rule that permitted foreign companies that trade on U.S. stock markets to submit regulatory filings in IFRS and not U.S. GAAP.

The agenda for the meeting also includes a review of the proposal in Release No. 34-59748, Amendments to Regulation SHO, which the SEC issued last April to clamp down on some forms of short selling.

02/19/10 -- SEC Chief Accountant Advises Public Companies to Wait on IFRS
As discussed in the article entitled "Chief Accountant Advises Public Companies to Wait on IFRS" in the February 18, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC is sticking to its oft-stated determination to reconsider its proposed rule on adopting IFRS for U.S. companies.

Yet 15 months after the proposal was issued and with more than six months of promises from senior SEC officials that a decision would be reached soon, there's no clear indication what that decision will mean.

"My remarks will leave you wanting, but I'm hopeful that you'll hear more soon," said SEC chief accountant James Kroeker at a February 17 conference on corporate governance sponsored by the Practising Law Institute in New York.

Kroeker explained that with so many significant changes to U.S. GAAP expected in the next year or so—he cited the FASB's projects on revenue recognition and contingency accounting as examples—companies would do better to focus on the one-off changes rather than prepare for a wholesale switch to IFRS.

02/18/10 -- SEC Updates Interpretive Guidance for Regulation S-K and 8-K Filings
As discussed in the article entitled "Interpretive Guidance Is Updated for Regulation S-K and 8-K Filings" in the February 17, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC's division of corporation finance published five compliance and disclosure interpretations for Regulation S-K and one C&DI for filing an Item 5.07 Form 8-K on February 16, 2010.

The Reg S-K C&DIs address:

  • The Item 401(a) and Item 401(c) disclosure requirements for directors;
  • Summary compensation disclosures in Item 402 as they relate to registration statements;
  • The incremental fair value of stock awards in Item 402(c)(2)(v) and Item 402(c)(2)(vi);
  • Non-equity incentive plan awards as defined by Item 402(a)(6); and
  • Reporting share grants and awards in the summary compensation table.

The Item 5.07 Form 8-K C&DI advises public companies to use the day after the shareholder meeting as the start of the four-day period within which the form has to be submitted to the SEC.

02/17/10 -- SEC's Investor Panel Gets Set for First Meeting of 2010
As discussed in the article entitled "Investor Panel Gets Set for First Meeting of 2010" in the February 3, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC's Investor Advisory Committee plans to meet February 22, 2010, in Washington and hear reports its subcommittees on investor education, investor protection, and shareholder rights.

The advisory panel also plans to hear recommendations on transparency in proxy voting and forming a committee on Regulation FD, according to a notice published by the SEC.

The advisory panel will also hear reports on a plan for disclosures related to environmental, social, and governance issues and a report on the financial reform legislation in Congress.

The panel was formed in June and had its most recent meeting in October.

02/16/10 -- SEC's Climate Change Guidance Became Effective with Addition to Federal Register
As discussed in the article entitled "Climate Change Guidance Is Effective with Addition to Federal Register" in the February 12, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC's interpretative guidance on climate change disclosures in Release No. 33-9106, Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, became effective with its publication in the Federal Register on February 8.

The rule became effective two weeks after the SEC approved it and one week following the publication of the release.

The disclosure obligations are outlined in Item 101, "Description of Business," Item 103, "Legal Proceedings," Item 503(c), "Risk Factors," and Item 303, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis," of Regulation S-K.

As a result of the changes, public companies will be well advised to gain a clear understanding of their carbon emissions and how the information about them should be disclosed in SEC filings. Companies should "review disclosures made in prior SEC filings to determine if they are adequate or need to be revised or updated," wrote the law firm Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP in a notice it distributed to clients.

02/12/10 -- Comment Deadlines for Some SEC Proposals
As discussed in the article entitled "Comment Deadlines for Some SEC Proposals" in the February 11, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the comment periods on some SEC proposed rules that are scheduled to expire in the next few months.

Release No. 34-60997, Regulation of Non-Public Trading Interest, would put limits on electronic trading systems called dark pools. Agency officials are worried that individual investors are shut out from the systems and that a two-tiered market will result as trading volume continues to shift away from the traditional stock exchanges. Regulators want to know if giving the trading systems extra rules to follow will improve market transparency and price discovery for all investors. Comments are due February 22.

Release No. 34-61379, Risk Management Controls for Brokers or Dealers with Market Access, proposes new Rule 15c3-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that would require brokers or dealers with access to trading directly on an exchange or alternative trading system, including those providing sponsored or direct market access to customers or other persons, to implement risk management controls and supervisory procedures reasonably designed to manage the financial, regulatory, and other risks of this business activity. Comments are due March 29.

Release No. 34-61414, Purchases of Certain Equity Securities by the Issuer and Others, proposes amendments to Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are intended to clarify and modernize the safe harbor provisions in light of market developments since Rule 10b-18's adoption in 1982. Comments are due March 1.

The SEC is also looking for public comment about various market structure issues, including high-frequency trading, order routing, market data linkages, and dark liquidity. On January 14, the commission issued Release No. 34-61358, Concept Release on Equity Market Structure, to help determine whether regulatory initiatives to improve the current equity market structure are needed and, if so, the specific nature of such initiatives.

Comments on Release No. 34-61358 are due April 21.

02/11/10 -- FASB and IASB Plan to Discuss Joint Financial Statement Presentation Project
As discussed in the article entitled "Boards Plan to Discuss Joint Financial Statement Presentation Project" in the February 10, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the IASB and FASB plan to address a number of issues related to the joint financial presentation project during a meeting at the IASB's offices in London on February 16-18.

According to the meeting agenda, the boards will discuss:

  • Application guidance for the analysis of changes in significant accounts;
  • The definition of a remeasurement;
  • Presentation of financing arising from operating activities; and
  • Presentation of cash flow information by a financial services entity.

In addition, the boards will discuss the differences in their tentative decisions on the October 2008 Preliminary Views (PV) No. 1630-100, Preliminary Views on Financial Statement Presentation, which was available for comment until April 2009. The boards are deliberating the issues raised by respondents to the discussion paper with a view to developing an exposure draft for release in April 2010.

The meeting will follow a February 12 meeting at the FASB's Norwalk, CT, offices of two advisory bodies, the International Group on financial statement presentation and the Financial Institutions Advisory Group. The groups plan to discuss how the boards can assess and communicate the costs and benefits of the financial statement presentation model to be proposed in the exposure draft.

02/10/10 -- Crisis Response, Proxy Access Will Top 2010 Agenda for the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance
As discussed in the article entitled "Crisis Response, Proxy Access Will Top Corporation Finance's 2010 Agenda" in the February 9, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the tumult in the financial markets is still reverberating through the SEC’s division of corporation finance and will go a long way in setting the division's priorities for the year ahead.

The crisis atmosphere meant that 2009 was an "incredibly busy time," said Meredith Cross, who became the division's chief in April. In 2010, she said she expects the division to draft guidance on:

  • Proxy disclosures and procedures in order to restore investor confidence in corporate governance;
  • Gaps in financial reporting and disclosures highlighted by the financial crisis in areas such as asset backed securities and the use of credit ratings;
  • Derivatives trading and other market practices that can pose risks to the financial system;
  • Modernizing the process for filing Forms 13D and 13G; and
  • Clarifying disclosure rules to make sure that companies are providing the right information to investors and not simply resorting to boilerplate statements.

Cross, who was speaking during the Practising Law Institute’s "SEC Speaks" conference in Washington on February 5, 2010, said her staff was also working to get guidance posted to the agency's website as quickly as possible, citing as an example, Interpretative Release No. 33-9106, Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change.

02/05/10 -- SEC Issues Interpretive Guidance on Climate Change Disclosures in Release No. 33-9106
As discussed in the article entitled "Interpretive Guidance on Climate Change Disclosures Is Issued in Release No. 33-9106" in the February 3, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC issued Release No. 33-9106, Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, on February 2.

Public companies are being advised to address any disclosure requirements related to climate change that may be triggered by lawsuits, business risks, lawsuits, regulation, or international treaties.

The disclosure obligations are outlined in Item 101, "Description of Business," Item 103, "Legal Proceedings," Item 503(c), "Risk Factors," and Item 303, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis," of Regulation S-K.

For example, under Item 101, a company would have to disclose any material capital costs on environmental controls, the SEC says. Item 503(c) might require disclosures about the risk a company faces from pending litigation related to environmental damage. 02/03/10 -- Proposed 2010 Budget Increase May Let SEC Add 200 Jobs
As discussed in the article entitled "Proposed 2010 Budget Increase May Let SEC Add 200 Jobs," in the February 2, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, President Obama proposed a $1.26 billion fiscal 2011 budget for the SEC on February 1, a 12% increase over the fiscal 2010 spending.

The extra funds "will do a great deal to help us keep pace with the continuing growth of the markets and provide necessary resources to support important regulatory initiatives in 2011," SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said.

According to the SEC's Congressional Justification for fiscal 2011, which begins October 1, 2010, the personnel budget would increase to $646 million from $582 million. The extra money will let the SEC add jobs in enforcement, examinations, and in the new division of risk, strategy and financial innovation.

02/02/10 -- Senior SEC Officials Set to Appear at 2010 Reprise of SEC Speaks
As discussed in the article entitled "Senior Officials Set to Appear at 2010 Reprise of SEC Speaks," in the February 2, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the Practising Law Institute's "The SEC Speaks in 2010," is scheduled for February 5-6 in Washington, and all five SEC commissioners and senior officials from the agency's divisions will discuss the key developments on the regulatory agenda.

Chairman Mary Schapiro is scheduled to give a keynote early on the first day after being introduced by Andrew Donohue, director of the division of investment management, and enforcement chief Robert Khuzami.

The agenda says financial reporting, disclosure, and accounting issues will be addressed by senior agency accountants, including:

  • James Kroeker, the SEC’s chief accountant;
  • Wayne Carnall, chief accountant of corporation finance;
  • Richard Sennett, chief accountant for investment management; and
  • Jason Flemmons, associate chief accountant in the enforcement division.

The scheduled commentators on accounting issues include former SEC commissioners Roel Campos, partner in charge of the law firm Cooley Godward Kronish’s Washington office; Edward Fleischman, senior counsel with Linklaters LLP; and Cynthia Glassman, a member of the board of directors of Navigant Consulting.

01/29/10 -- SEC Issues Plan to Amend Stock Buyback Safe Harbor in Release No. 34-61414
As discussed in the article entitled "Plan to Amend Stock Buyback Safe Harbor Issued in Release No. 34-61414," in the January 27, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently released a proposed revision of a stock buyback safe harbor in Release No. 34-61414, Purchases of Certain Equity Securities by the Issuer and Others.

"The increased speed of today’s market activity, as evidenced by flickering quotes, has made it increasingly difficult for issuers to ensure that every purchase of its common stock during the day will meet the requirements of the safe harbor in Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934," the SEC said in Release No. 34-61414.

The proposal will be out for comment until March 1.

Public companies have to make their share repurchases through one broker-dealer per day and have to satisfy the price, volume, and timing restrictions in Rule 10b-18 in order to qualify for the safe harbor. But the restrictions haven't been updated in years and were written before the advent of common techniques such as volume-weighted average pricing (VWAP).

01/27/10 -- SEC Issues Additional C&DIs to Address Expanded Proxy Disclosure Requirements
As discussed in the article entitled "Additional C&DIs Are Issued to Address Expanded Proxy Disclosure Requirements," in the January 25, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC's division of corporation finance recently updated its compliance and disclosure interpretations to explain some of the proxy disclosure rules that will be in effect for the 2010 shareholder meeting season following the issuance of Release No. 33-9089, Proxy Disclosure Enhancements.

Release No. 33-9089 requires public companies to increase the amount of information they provide on executive compensation policies and how they affect risk management. In addition, proxy statement summary compensation tables will have to include the fair value of stock and option grants under FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, formerly SFAS No. 123(R).

The rule goes into effect February 28, 2010, in time for 2010 shareholder meetings.

The C&DIs address:

  • How registrants should report the results of an annual meeting of shareholders on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q, if the meeting takes place before February 28, but the forms are due on or after that date; and
  • How the February 28 effective date for the Regulation S-K amendments affects registration statements filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for an issuer with a fiscal year ending on or after December 20, 2009.

01/26/10 -- SEC Issues Small Business Compliance Guide for Energy Companies
As discussed in the article entitled "Small Business Compliance Guide Issued for Energy Companies," in the January 25, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently published a small business compliance guide on its website to reflect the changes in Release No. 33-8995, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting.

The final rule was issued in December 2008 and became effective at the beginning of 2010. It amended the disclosure requirements in Regulation S-K, and Regulation S-X, and added Subpart 1200 to Regulation S-K to codify the revised disclosure requirements from Industry Guide 2, which was phased out.

The rule requires energy companies to price their proved oil and gas reserves with the average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month for the 12 months prior to the end of the quarter or year.

The old disclosure requirements relied on the closing price from the last day of the fiscal year.

The rule also revised the definition of proved oil and gas reserves and amended Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X.

01/21/10 -- SEC Seeks Public Comment on Equity Market Structure in Concept Release No. 34-61358
As discussed in the article entitled "Commission Seeks Public Comment on Equity Market Structure in Concept Release No. 34-61358," in the January 19, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently issued Release No. 34-61358, Concept Release on Equity Market Structure.

The 74-page concept release asks for public comment about various market structure issues, including high frequency trading, order routing, market data linkages, and undisplayed, or "dark," liquidity. The commission plans to use the comments to help determine whether regulatory initiatives to improve the current equity market structure are needed, and the specific nature of such initiatives.

Comments on the release are due by April 21.

01/20/10 -- SEC Approves AS 7 and Conforming Amendment
As discussed in the article entitled "Commission Approves AS 7 and Conforming Amendment," in the January 19, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently approved the PCAOB’s Auditing Standard (AS) 7, Engagement Quality Review and Conforming Amendment.

AS 7 applies to all audit engagements and engagements to review interim financial information conducted under PCAOB standards. The standard requires the reviewer to:

  • Evaluate the significant judgments made and related conclusions reached by the engagement team in forming the overall conclusion on the engagement and in preparing the engagement report; and
  • Perform procedures designed to focus the reviewer on the engagement team’s conclusions.

According to AS 7, if the reviewer is from within the firm, he or she must be a partner or the equivalent. The reviewer must also possess the accounting, auditing, and reporting skills sufficient to serve as the engagement partner.

AS 7 is effective for both the review of audits and of interim reviews for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009.

01/06/10 -- Financial Crisis Advisory Group Urges Continuing with Convergence Effort
As discussed in the article entitled "Crisis Panel Urges Continuing with Convergence Effort" in the January 5, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the leaders of the Financial Crisis Advisory Group said that completing the process of converging global accounting standards remains “critically important” despite the easing of the global crisis that led to the group's formation.

The message was delivered in a January 4 letter the FCAG sent to the chairman of the Group of 20 nations, Prime Minister Chung Un-Chan of the Republic of Korea, which has just assumed leadership of the G-20 for the coming year.

Starting with a November 2008 summit in Washington and subsequent meetings in London and Pittsburgh, the G-20 has been urging the IASB to complete its work on the accounting for financial instruments in response to the financial crisis. The G-20 has also issued several statements pressing the FASB and IASB to continue working on international convergence.

"In order to develop high-quality standards that provide unbiased, transparent and relevant information, it is critical that the boards enjoy a high degree of independence from undue commercial and political pressures," wrote FCAG co-chairs Harvey Goldschmid and Hans Hoogervorst in the letter they signed on behalf of the other panel members.

01/05/10 -- In Release No. IA-2968, SEC Establishes Requirements for Investment Advisors in Audits of Client Assets
As discussed in the article entitled "Release No. IA-2968 Establishes Requirements for Investment Advisors in Audits of Client Assets" in the January 4, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently issued Release No. IA-2968, Custody of Funds or Securities of Clients by Investment Advisers.

The release amends Rule 206(4)-2 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by requiring registered investment advisers to be subject to surprise exams once a year by independent public accountants to verify client assets.

Release No. IA-2968 requires investment advisers to have qualified custodians maintaining client funds and securities send account statements directly to the advisory clients.

The rule amendment eliminates an alternative employed by advisers that permits them to send quarterly account statements to clients if they undergo annual surprise exams by an independent auditor. The SEC thinks that having custodians send statements directly to clients will provide more integrity to account statements.

The rule will become effective 60 days after its publication in the Federal Register, which normally occurs a few days after a rule has been posted on the SEC's website.

01/04/10 -- SEC Proposes to Extend Shelf-Registration Exemption to Underwriters and Brokers in Release No. 33-9098
As discussed in the article entitled "Plan to Extend Shelf-Registration Exemption to Underwriters and Brokers Offered in Release No. 33-9098" in the December 23, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently issued Release No. 33-9098, Revisions to Rule 163, to propose expanding an exemption on communications with investors.

The proposal seeks to aid the process of capital formation by expanding an exemption under Rule 163 of the Securities Act of 1933, and permit underwriters and brokers working on the behalf of large-cap companies to talk to investors.

For a broker or underwriter to receive the exemption, the company has to meet the SEC's definition of well-known seasoned issuer, which generally means that the company has to have a market cap of $700 million or $1 billion in securities other than common stock and is current with its regulatory filings. Shell companies and limited partnerships don't qualify for the WKSI classification under the ineligible issuer definition of Rule 405 of the 1933 Act.

Comments on the proposal are due January 27, 2010.

12/28/09 -- SEC Expands Proxy Disclosures on Executive Compensation, Risk Management in Release No. 33-9089
As discussed in the article entitled "Proxy Disclosures on Executive Compensation, Risk Management Are Expanded in Release No. 33-9089" in the December 24, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC issued Release No. 33-9089, Proxy Disclosure Enhancements, just hours after the commissioners approved the changes at a public meeting.

The SEC said it scaled back some of the changes from the proposed version of the rule, Release No. 33-9052, so that the amendments could be put in place for proxy season, but it hopes to address some of the other topics, such as adding to the number of executives for which compensation has to be disclosed and ending an exemption that permitted some companies not to reveal their performance target data, in upcoming proposals.

The changes that were implemented include increasing the amount of information companies will have to provide about the board's role in risk management and director qualifications.

The summary compensation table and director compensation table as described in Item 402 of Regulation S-K will have to provide the aggregate grant date fair value of stock and options awarded during the year according to FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, formerly SFAS No. 123(R).

12/21/09 -- SEC Expands Proxy Disclosures on Executive Compensation, Risk Management in Release No. 33-9089
As discussed in the article entitled "Proxy Disclosures on Executive Compensation, Risk Management Are Expanded in Release No. 33-9089" in the December 18, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC issued Release No. 33-9089, Proxy Disclosure Enhancements, just hours after the commissioners approved the changes at a public meeting.

The SEC said it scaled back some of the changes from the proposed version of the rule, Release No. 33-9052, so that the amendments could be put in place for proxy season, but it hopes to address some of the other topics, such as adding to the number of executives for which compensation has to be disclosed and ending an exemption that permitted some companies not to reveal their performance target data, in upcoming proposals.

The changes that were implemented include increasing the amount of information companies will have to provide about the board's role in risk management and director qualifications.

The summary compensation table and director compensation table as described in Item 402 of Regulation S-K will have to provide the aggregate grant date fair value of stock and options awarded during the year according to FASB ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, formerly SFAS No. 123(R).

12/18/09 -- SEC Extends ABS Web Disclosure Option in Release No. 33-9087
As discussed in the article entitled "ABS Web Disclosure Option Extended in Release No. 33-9087" in the December 17, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC granted a one-year extension of a disclosure option for sponsors of securitized trusts in Release No. 33-9087, Extension of Filing Accommodation for Static Pool Information in Filings With Respect to Asset-Backed Securities.

The rule amends Rule 312 of Regulation S-T by extending its effectiveness to include the static pool, or underlying asset information, in asset-backed securities (ABS) offerings issued before December 31, 2010.

Regulation S-T provides the guidelines for submitting electronic filings to the SEC. Rule 312 allows pool information posted to the trust sponsor's website to be considered part of the prospectus and had been set to expire at the end of this year.

The extension was proposed in October in Release No. 33-9074, with a comment period that ended November 23.

The SEC's division of corporation finance said the extra year would give it time to review the ABS offering process and static pool disclosures. The staff wants to consider the costs associated with submitting the information to the EDGAR filing system, which the SEC believes is still not capable of handling the massive amounts of data in the static pools.

12/16/09 -- SEC Reopens Comment Period for Proxy Access in Release No. 33-9086
As discussed in the article entitled "Comment Period for Proxy Access Proposal Is Reopened in Release No. 33-9086" in the December 15, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently said in Release No. 33-9086, Facilitating Shareholder Director Nominations, that it wants the public's views on the additional data and related analyses the commission received after the close of the original comment period on August 17.

In Release No. 33-9046, the SEC proposed changes to facilitate the rights of shareholders to nominate directors on corporate boards.

According to Release No. 33-9086, the SEC staff continues to expect to make a final recommendation to the commission in early 2010.

Comments on the data and related analyses are due no later than 30 days after the publication of the commission's release in the Federal Register, which normally occurs a few days after a rule is posted to the SEC's website.

12/14/09 -- SEC Seeks Comments on 2010 Mutual Fund Risk/Return Summary Taxonomy
As discussed in the article entitled "Comments Sought on 2010 Mutual Fund Risk/Return Summary Taxonomy" in the December 11, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the SEC recently said that it has developed the 2010 Mutual Fund Risk/Return Summary Taxonomy, an update to the 2008 taxonomy.

Public comments are due December 31.

The agency said the updates were made primarily "to optimize the taxonomy for use in the commission's previewer and viewer which are currently being updated to support this taxonomy." The update includes what the SEC classified as minor technical edits and corrections to the 2008 edition. The element names and content of the taxonomy remain unchanged.

After the staff completes its review of the feedback next year, the taxonomy will be finalized for use with the SEC's systems.

More SEC articles...

Back to Top

FASB

03/18/10 -- Standard-Setters on Track to Meet Deadline for Convergence Projects
As discussed in the article entitled "Standard-Setters on Track to Meet Convergence Deadline" in the March 16, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB expect to meet the June 2011 deadline for convergence projects.

IASB Chairman Sir David Tweedie said the FASB and IASB are on target to achieve deadline outlined in their joint September 2008 Memorandum of Understanding.

The boards will publish seven joint proposals in the second quarter of 2010, and propose other changes to bring their standards in line with each other, Sir David said during a March 16 meeting of the Council of the European Union.

In April 2009, the heads of state of the G-20 called on the accounting standard-setters to step up their work to change the guidance for valuing financial instruments. In November, the boards issued a joint statement reaffirming their commitment to the convergence projects in the MOU, which was endorsed by the G-20 leaders in September.

Sir David said the boards have met every month and logged more than 100 hours of joint meetings since their November statement.

03/16/10 -- FASB and IASB Issue Draft Concepts Statement for Conceptual Framework
As discussed in the article entitled "Draft Concepts Statement Issued as Latest Proposal for Conceptual Framework" in the March 15, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB issued Exposure Draft (ED) No. 1770-100, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: The Reporting Entity, on March 11, 2010.

The release of the exposure draft is just the latest stage in the joint project to revise the model for accounting standards. The draft will be out for comment until July 16.

The proposed statement of financial accounting concepts includes draft guidance that defines a reporting entity, the concept of control, and the purpose of consolidated financial statements.

According to the draft, an entity that controls other entities should consolidate the financial activities of the other enterprises in its results.

Concepts statements are not considered authoritative guidance, according to FASB ASC 105-10-05, formerly SFAS No. 168. But the FASB said it "expects to reconsider the authoritative status of the FASB concepts statements at completion of the conceptual framework project."

The review may elevate the status of the statements to authoritative guidance.

03/15/10 -- FASB Gets Ready to Publish Financial Instruments Proposal
As discussed in the article entitled "With Deadline for Financial Instruments Proposal Looming, Project Debate Nears Final Stage" in the March 12, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB faces one of its busiest weeks in months as it prepares to discuss some of the final aspects of its forthcoming proposal on financial instruments.

In a meeting planned for March 17, the standard-setter will discuss three topics related to financial instruments: the amortized cost option, loan commitments, and the scope of the guidance.

Two days later, the board plans to spend four hours dealing with the disclosure requirements in the proposed guidance and other issues that it needs to wrap up before publishing the exposure draft later this month or in early April.

On March 18, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) plans to discuss share-based payment awards and seven other issues.

The agenda for the week also includes joint meetings between the FASB and IASB for March 15-17.

03/11/10 -- FASB Issues ASU No. 2010-11 and Clarifies Scope Exception in ASC 815-15-15
As discussed in the article entitled "ASU No. 2010-11 Clarifies Scope Exception in FASB ASC 815-15-15" in the March 9, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives, on March 5 to clarify the guidance in FASB ASC 815-15-15-8 and FASB ASC 815-15-15-9.

The FASB said ASU No. 2010-11 resolves a potential ambiguity about the breadth of the embedded credit derivative scope exception with regard to some types of contracts, such as collateralized debt obligations and synthetic CDOs. The scope exception in FASB ASC 815-15-15-8 and FASB ASC 815-15-15-9 will no longer apply to some contracts that contain an embedded credit derivative feature that transfers credit risk.

The changes include deleting FASB ASC 815-15-15-8 from the Codification of U.S. GAAP and amending FASB ASC 815-15-15-9 to state that the "transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another is an embedded derivative feature that shall not be subject to the application of paragraph 815-10-15-11 and Section 815-15-25," Derivatives and Hedging: Embedded Derivatives: Recognition, formerly SFAS No. 155.

The amendments to U.S. GAAP will be effective at the start of an entity’s first fiscal quarter that begins after June 15, 2010, the FASB said. For most banks, which are on calendar fiscal years, that will mean the third quarter. But the FASB is giving companies the option of applying the new guidance as early as the second quarter.

03/10/10 -- FASB and IASB to Hold Joint Meeting on Financial Instruments Projects
As discussed in the article entitled "Boards to Hold Joint Meeting on Financial Instruments Projects" in the March 8, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB will hold a joint meeting on March 11 to discuss several items related to the financial instruments with characteristics of equity project.

The boards are scheduled to discuss several items connected with this project, including economic compulsion, accounting requirements for settlement, conversion, expiration and modification of an instrument, and disclosure requirements.

The FASB issued Preliminary Views (PV) No. 1550-100, Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity, in November 2007. The draft calls for using the basic ownership approach to classify certain financial instruments as equity if they are both the most subordinated interest in an entity and they entitle the holder to a share of the entity’s net assets after all higher priority claims have been satisfied.

The boards tentatively plan to publish an exposure draft in the second quarter of 2010. During their February 18 meeting, the boards decided that instruments currently accounted for under IFRS 2, Share-based Payment, and FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, formerly SFAS No. 123(R), are not within the scope of this project. The FASB issued Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. EITF090J Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).

03/08/10 -- FASB to Discuss Hedge Accounting During Next Board Meeting
As discussed in the article entitled "Hedge Accounting on Tap for Next Board Meeting" in the March 5, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB said it plans to discuss financial statement presentation and the hedge accounting portion of its financial instruments project at its March 10 weekly meeting.

The FASB and IASB have differed on the hedge accounting issue. At a February 17 joint meeting, the IASB tentatively decided to explore new criteria to determine the risk components eligible for designation as hedged items.

IASB Chairman Sir David Tweedie said the IASB would vote on questions raised in papers from its research staff that address issues related to a bifurcation method for certain liabilities and a fair value option that relates to an entity's issuance of its own credit risk. The staff said the issues may become relevant to the FASB, depending upon decisions it makes.

The FASB tentatively decided that bifurcation-by-risk would be permitted for hedged financial items within the context of the recognition and measurement model for financial instruments.

03/04/10 -- FASB Task Force Set to Take On Share-Based Payment Awards and Other Issues
As discussed in the article entitled "Task Force Set to Take On Share-Based Payment Awards and Other Issues" in the March 3, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force is scheduled to discuss share-based payment awards and seven other issues during its March 18 meeting.

The agenda for the meeting, which will be held at the FASB’s Norwalk, CT, headquarters, includes:

  • EITF Issue No. 09-J, "Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades";
  • EITF Issue No. 09-D, "Application of Topic 946, Financial Services—Investment Companies, by Real Estate Investment Companies";
  • EITF Issue No. 09-B, "Consideration of an Insurer's Accounting for Majority-Owned Investments When the Ownership Is through a Separate Account";
  • EITF Issue No. 09-H, "Selected Healthcare Organization Issues (Presentation of Insurance Claims and Related Insurance Recoveries; Revenue Recognition; and Measuring Charity Care for Disclosure)";
  • EITF Issue No. 08-9, "Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition";
  • EITF Issue No. 09-G, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts";
  • EITF Issue No. 09-I, "Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset"; and
  • EITF Issue No. 09-F, "Casino Base Jackpot Liabilities."

03/02/10 -- Statement Presentation and Fair Value on Tap for Upcoming FASB and IASB Meetings
As discussed in the article entitled "Statement Presentation and Fair Value on Tap for Upcoming Meetings" in the February 26, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB plan to discuss the transition and effective date that should be included in the exposure draft on financial statement presentation at a joint meeting on March 3.

The boards expect to publish an exposure draft near the end of April.

The boards will also discuss the IASB’s plan for publishing educational material to go along with an international standard on fair value measurement.

At their February 18 meeting, the boards tentatively decided that the converged fair value measurement standard should not include additional guidance for measuring the fair value of difficult to value assets and liabilities—including unquoted equity instruments. The boards also decided not to include indicators of when cost might be an appropriate estimate of fair value.

03/01/10 -- ASU No. 2010-09 Amends Subsequent Event Date Disclosure Requirements
As discussed in the article entitled "ASU No. 2010-09 Amends Subsequent Event Date Disclosure Requirements" in the February 26, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, removing some contradictions between the requirements of U.S. GAAP and the SEC’s filing rules.

The amendments to FASB ASC 855-10-25 get rid of the requirement that public companies disclose the date of their financial statements in both issued and revised financial statements. According to the FASB, the revised statements include those that have been changed to correct an error or conform to a retrospective application of U.S. GAAP.

If private companies and other entities not regulated by the SEC are revising their financial statements, they will have to disclose both the date they issued the original financial statements and the revised versions, the FASB said. The date that both statements were available for issuance will also have to be disclosed.

02/24/10 -- FEI Asks FASB and IASB for Common Effective Date for All MOU Projects
As discussed in the article entitled "FEI Asks for Common Effective Date for All MOU Projects" in the February 22, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, Financial Executives International wants the FASB and IASB to set a common effective date for the converged guidance they produce from their September 2008 Memorandum of Understanding.

In a February 12 letter to IASB Chairman Sir David Tweedie and FASB Chairman Robert Herz, Arnold Hanish, the head of FEI's committee on corporate reporting, wrote that the standards should have a common effective date because they are interdependent. He recommended that the boards provide a three-year implementation period, allow for early adoption, and give financial statement preparers as much flexibility as possible in choosing the manner of initial adoption.

"Our members identified financial statement presentation, leases, and pensions as the most impactful standards due to the level of systems and business process changes that will be required to implement the standards," Hanish wrote. FEI members said an effective date on a standard that precedes the effective date of a related standard would "drive inefficiencies as preparers would need to rework the design of business processes and systems."

In a separate letter, Hanish wrote that FEI would assist the IASB and FASB with the MOU projects, which present a "multitude of potential challenges" for the boards as they communicate information to constituents about changes to accounting standards.

02/22/10 -- FASB's Push on Financial Instruments Is Set to Continue
As discussed in the article entitled "Board's Push on Financial Instruments Set to Continue" in the February 19, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB said it will discuss three pieces of its financial instruments project at its February 24 weekly meeting at the board’s Norwalk, CT, headquarters.

At the upcoming meeting, the FASB will discuss when equity investments currently accounted for by the equity method should be included within the scope of the project. The board also wants to discuss how an entity should classify and measure financial liabilities.

In addition, the board plans to discuss which entities and industries will be covered in the scope of the draft guidance on financial instruments it hopes to release in March.

The FASB has also planned a review of the June 2009 Exposure Draft (ED) No. 1700-100, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The board has been close to finalizing the guidance for months, and it plans to issue a final Accounting Standards Update in early 2010.

02/09/10 -- Second Edition of FASB Update Describes the Importance of Codification
As discussed in the article entitled "Second Edition of FASB Update Describes the Importance of Codification" in the February 8, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB's Accounting Standards Codification and financial statement presentation are among the issues covered in the second edition of the FASB Update.

The newsletter, published on February 4, is intended to keep accounting practitioners, investors, and other people with a stake in standard-setting current with the board's standard-setting activity. The latest edition includes a brief description about the importance of Codification in reducing the complexity of U.S. GAAP.

The four-volume printed version of the FASB Codification totals 2,900 pages, the Update said. Prior to Codification, U.S. GAAP had encompassed about 10,000 pages of content from the FASB, AICPA, and the SEC—although some accounting professionals often cited a page count that was twice as high.

The Codification reorganizes the thousands of pronouncements from U.S. GAAP into roughly 90 accounting topics.

02/08/10 -- FASB Plans to Discuss Financial Instruments and Credit Quality
As discussed in the article entitled "Board Plans to Discuss Financial Instruments and Credit Quality" in the February 5, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB has scheduled two meetings for February 10.

One session with the IASB will deal with international convergence issues. The board’s regular weekly meeting will take place in a second session. The agenda for both meetings includes the financial instruments project.

During the meeting with the IASB, the two boards will begin discussing how to measure financial liabilities. The boards also have scheduled a session on insurance accounting during which they plan to address reinsurance and policyholder accounting and accounting by the insurer.

During the FASB-only meeting, the U.S. board will discuss issues related to entry value and scope in the financial instruments project. The other topics on the agenda include disclosures about credit quality and the allowance for credit losses, and the proposed amendments to the guidance for subsequent events in the proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 1760-100, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.

02/04/10 -- Progress on Hedge Accounting Project Depends Upon Moving Ahead With Financial Instruments
As discussed in the article entitled "Progress on Hedge Accounting Project Depends Upon Moving Ahead With Financial Instruments," in the February 3, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the differences the FASB and IASB have in their hedge accounting project follow the pattern that has been set for months with their larger project on financial instruments accounting.

With both projects, the IASB's pursuit of a course that makes a greater use of amortized cost measurements on the face of the financial statements has set it apart from the FASB, which has endorsed a greater use of fair value measurements.

The differences that emerged during a February 2 videoconference meeting of the two standard-setting bodies resulted in a decision to have the research staffs look at the proposed treatment of bifurcation-by-risk, a method that banks commonly use to measure a hedge's effectiveness.

The IASB is planning to employ bifurcation in the hedging phase of the financial instruments project.

The FASB, with the support of investors, wants to get rid of bifurcation, and proposed doing so in 2008 in Exposure Draft (ED) No. 1590-100, Accounting for Hedging Activities: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. But the draft guidance is opposed by two of the FASB's five members, Leslie Seidman and Lawrence Smith, and these differences were clear during the meeting.

02/01/10 -- FASB Plans to Meet Twice in Week Ahead
As discussed in the article entitled "Board Plans to Meet Twice in Week Ahead," in the January 29, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB said it will meet with the IASB via video conference on February 2 to continue discussing the projects on comprehensive income, leases, financial instruments with characteristics of equity, and hedge accounting for financial instruments.

On the following day, the FASB will meet to discuss revenue recognition and reporting discontinued operations. The U.S. board plans to discuss the effects of the proposed revenue recognition model on a business's accounting for costs related to customer contracts.

With the discussion on lease accounting, the boards plan to address the definition of a lease and how to differentiate a lease from service contract.

For the review on financial instruments with characteristics of equity, the boards plan to discuss the alternatives for distinguishing between liabilities and equity that would be based in part on IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation.

With hedge accounting, the boards plan to discuss the issues relating to eligible hedged items.

01/28/10 -- FASB Will Form Working Group in February to Study ASU Formats
As discussed in the article entitled "Working Group Will Form in February to Study ASU Formats," in the January 27, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB plans to form a working group in February to review the format of its Accounting Standards Updates after some accountants complained that the updates were difficult to understand. Peter Proestakes, an assistant director with the board's research staff, will head the group. No date had been set for completing the group's work. The ASUs became the standard format for amending the FASB's Accounting Standards Codification when the board introduced its new hierarchy for U.S. GAAP in July 2009.

01/25/10 -- FASB's ASU No. 2010-06 Expands Disclosures for Fair Value Measurements
As discussed in the article entitled "ASU No. 2010-06 Expands Disclosures for Fair Value Measurements," in the January 22, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.

Reporting entities will have to provide information about movements of assets among Levels 1 and 2 of the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (FASB ASC 820), the FASB said. They also will have to provide a reconciliation of purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of anything valued with a Level 3 method, which is used to price the hardest to value instruments.

Entities will have to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities.

The guidance will be effective for any fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2010, and it should be used for quarterly and annual filings, the FASB said.

01/14/10 -- FASB's ASU No. 2010-03 Amends Guidance for Energy Companies
As discussed in the article entitled "ASU No. 2010-03 Amends Guidance for Energy Companies," in the January 8, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-03, Extractive Industries—Oil and Gas, (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosure, to align U.S. GAAP with the SEC's updated reporting and disclosure requirements for energy companies that went into effect on January 1.

ASU No. 2010-3:

  • Expands the definition of oil- and gas-producing activities to include actions like extracting hydrocarbons from tar sands and shale deposits;
  • Calls for energy companies to value their proved reserves by averaging the price from the first day of each month from the previous 12 months instead of using a year-end price; and
  • Clarifies that an energy company's equity method investments must be considered in determining whether it has significant oil and gas producing activities.

The changes to GAAP were prompted by the SEC's December 2008 issuance of Release No. 33-8995, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. Both the SEC's final rule and the amendments to FASB ASC 932 reflect changes in practice and technology that occurred over the last several decades.

01/13/10 -- FASB Clarifies Scope of Topic 810 With Issuance of ASU No. 2010-02
As discussed in the article entitled "Scope of Topic 810 Is Clarified with Issuance of ASU No. 2010-02," in the January 8, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary—a Scope Clarification, in an attempt to resolve a conflict between the consolidation guidance in FASB ASC 810, and other provisions in U.S. GAAP dealing with asset derecognition and the recognition of gains or losses.

The FASB said it was simply clarifying the scope of FASB ASC 810-10, Consolidation, and not changing it, but the board admitted that the amendments would lead to expanded disclosures about changes in ownership of subsidiaries.

Entities will have to disclose their valuation techniques for measuring their investments in subsidiaries or groups of assets, the nature of their continuing involvement in a subsidiary after it has been sold or spun off, and whether the transaction that disposed of their interest in the subsidiary was with a business with which the company or its executives have financial ties.

The text that was added to FASB ASC 810-10-40, Consolidation—Overall—Derecognition, excludes some dispositions of not-for-profit activities and asset sales like in-substance real estate from the scope of Topic 810.

The FASB said entities should apply the amendments in ASU No. 2010-02 for the first reporting period in which they applied SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51. The scope clarification in the ASU was intended to resolve a discrepancy that became apparent following the issuance of SFAS No. 160 at the end of 2007.

Entities that had already adopted SFAS No. 160 by the beginning of 2010 should apply the amendments in ASU No. 2010-02 at the beginning of the first reporting period that ended December 15, 2009, or later, the FASB said. The revisions should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity applied SFAS No. 160.

01/12/10 -- FASB Plans to Address Going Concern and Financial Instruments Projects
As discussed in the article entitled "Board Plans to Address Going Concern and Financial Instruments Projects," in the January 11, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB's January 13 weekly meeting will be one of four events board members hold at the standard-setter's Norwalk, CT, headquarters during the coming week.

The board meeting will include discussions on the financial instruments project and the pending going concern standard.

The FASB issued Exposure Draft (ED) No. 1650-100, Going Concern, in October 2008 for a two-month comment period and was ready to issue a final standard in February 2009. But after additional outreach with accounting practitioners, the board agreed four months later to broaden the project's scope. The board plans to decide if it will need to meet again on the project.

The board will discuss credit impairments and interest income for certain financial assets during the financial instruments portion of the meeting.

The FASB also plans to hold two education sessions, one on the day of the board meeting and a second on January 15, in preparation for three days of meetings with the IASB in London. The board is also scheduled to meet with its Investors Technical Advisory Committee on January 12, and ITAC members plan to address revenue recognition and statement presentation during the meeting.

01/11/10 -- FASB's ASU No. 2010-01 Amends Guidance for Dividends Paid in Shares
As discussed in the article entitled "ASU No. 2010-01 Amends Guidance for Dividends Paid in Shares," in the January 6, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-01, Equity (Topic 505)—Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash, a Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.

The amendments to FASB ASC 505-20, Equity—Stock Dividends and Stock Splits, and FASB ASC 260-10, Earnings Per Share, require classifying the stock portion of a dividend payment as a share issuance if there is a limit on the cash portion of the dividend payment. The stipulation covers dividends that can be issued as part cash, part stock.

The amendments to U.S. GAAP are part of an effort by the FASB to reduce the varied applications of the accounting for stock dividends paid in cash and shares.

The FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) approved the changes in September 2009, and they were issued later that month in draft form in proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Equity (Topic 505), and Earnings per Share (Topic 260): Accounting for Stock Dividends, Including Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash.

The guidance is effective for any reporting period that has ended since December 15, 2009, and the FASB said it should be applied on a retrospective basis.

01/08/10 -- Two FASB ASUs Add SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 to GAAP Codification
As discussed in the article entitled "Two ASUs Add SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 to GAAP Codification," in the December 24, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB recently issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860)—Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and ASU No. 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810)—Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities.

With the release of the two documents, the changes from two of the FASB's most important pieces of guidance of the year, SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, and SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), have been incorporated into the standard-setter’s Accounting Standards Codification for U.S. GAAP.

ASU No. 2009-16 amends FASB ASC 860-10-05-1, Transfers and Servicing, with regard to financial assets. It also establishes the accounting for transfers of servicing rights.

ASU No. 2009-17 amends the variable-interest entity guidance in FASB ASC 810-10-05-8 to clarify the accounting treatment for legal entities in which equity investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without financial support.

01/07/10 -- Four of FASB’s Proposed Amendments to GAAP Have Comments Due in Early 2010
As discussed in the article entitled "Proposed Amendments to GAAP Have Comments Due in Early 2010," in the December 29, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the public comment periods for some proposed amendments to FASB guidance are set to expire in early 2010.

Here are the comment periods for some FASB proposals to amend various standards within U.S. GAAP:

  • Proposed ASU, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)—Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), would clarify when some stock awards would be classified as equity and not liabilities. The comment period ends February 12;
  • Proposed ASU, Receivables (Topic 310)—Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), would amend Subtopic 310-30 to resolve an inconsistency that has emerged in the accounting for troubled loans that are sold as part of a pool and then modified after the borrower starts missing payments. The FASB wants to know if accountants agree with a decision by the EITF that once a pool of loans are accounted for as a single unit, individual loans have to remain part of the pool even if they have been restructured or refinanced. Comments are due by February 12;
  • Proposed ASU, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944)—Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), would provide details on the criteria used to determine when some costs associated with customer acquisition and retention would be capitalized and when they would be expensed during the period in which they occur. The comment deadline is February 12; and
  • Proposed ASU, Entertainment—Casinos (Topic 924)—Casino Base Jackpot Liabilities (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), would resolve the differing interpretations drawn from the AICPA's Audit and Accounting Guide: Casinos. Comments on the proposal are due February 12.

More FASB articles...

Back to Top

AICPA

9/04/08 -- AICPA's Proposed Amendment of AU Section 722 Would Cover Private Company Interim Statements
The Auditing Standards Board (ASB), the senior technical committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) designated for issuing auditing, attestation, and quality control standards and guidance, issued an exposure draft on September 2, 2008, that would amend AU Section 722, "Interim Financial Information."

Comments on the proposal are due by November 3.

The proposed Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) would amend AU Section 722 to accommodate reviews of interim financial information of nonissuers, including companies offering securities in private offerings under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 or participating in private equity exchanges.

The proposed guidance would apply when the interim financial information is intended to provide a periodic update to year-end reporting and the accountant either:

  • Has audited the entity's latest annual financial statement, or

  • Is auditing the current year financial statements and the entity's latest annual financial statements were audited by another auditor.

In addition, the amendment would remove the guidance for reviews of the interim financial statements of issuers in AU Section 722 because the guidance resides in the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).

The proposed SAS would be effective for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early application would be permitted.

More AICPA articles...

Back to Top 

PCAOB

12/02/09 -- PCAOB's 2010 Budget Is $26 Million Higher Than 2009 Total
As discussed in the article entitled "2010 Budget Is $26 Million Higher Than 2009 Total" in the December 1, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the four members of the PCAOB unanimously approved a budget of $183.3 million for 2010, $25.7 million more than the 2009 total of $157.6 million.

The board also approved a strategic plan for fiscal years 2009 to 2013.

The budget has to be approved by the SEC before it is final.

Some 72% of the 2010 budget will go to personnel. The spending plan projects that head count will increase to 636 by the end of 2010 from 576 at the end of 2009. The board fell below its approved budget for 2009 due to timing of new hires, but ended up with a total of 576 employees, as opposed to the 531 allotted for in the budget. Since most of the additional people were hired later in the year, the added staff had no significant impact on the 2009 budget, but will affect spending in the year ahead. Approximately $87 million, or 47.5% of the total, will go to fund the division of inspections and registration.

The enforcement division is to be allotted $15 million.

More PCAOB articles...

Back to Top

GASB

11/12/09 -- FAF Trustees Switch Next Meeting to Washington
As discussed in the article entitled "FAF Trustees Switch Next Meeting to Washington" in the November 10, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the Financial Accounting Foundation, the body that oversees the FASB and the GASB, switched its November 17 meeting to Washington instead of Norwalk, CT.

In addition, the session will be completely closed to the public, which is a break from the normal procedure for foundation meetings. The revised meeting announcement said the agenda will include "administrative, oversight, and strategic matters."

The FASB had little to offer about the substance of the meeting, other than to say that FAF and FASB members would not be meeting with SEC officials.

On November 5, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro wrote a letter to Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, to not promote any legislation that would undermine the FASB's independence.

Back to Top

IASB

03/18/10 -- Standard-Setters on Track to Meet Deadline for Convergence Projects
As discussed in the article entitled "Standard-Setters on Track to Meet Convergence Deadline" in the March 16, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB expect to meet the June 2011 deadline for convergence projects.

IASB Chairman Sir David Tweedie said the FASB and IASB are on target to achieve deadline outlined in their joint September 2008 Memorandum of Understanding.

The boards will publish seven joint proposals in the second quarter of 2010, and propose other changes to bring their standards in line with each other, Sir David said during a March 16 meeting of the Council of the European Union.

In April 2009, the heads of state of the G-20 called on the accounting standard-setters to step up their work to change the guidance for valuing financial instruments. In November, the boards issued a joint statement reaffirming their commitment to the convergence projects in the MOU, which was endorsed by the G-20 leaders in September.

Sir David said the boards have met every month and logged more than 100 hours of joint meetings since their November statement.

03/16/10 -- FASB and IASB Issue Draft Concepts Statement for Conceptual Framework
As discussed in the article entitled "Draft Concepts Statement Issued as Latest Proposal for Conceptual Framework" in the March 15, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB issued Exposure Draft (ED) No. 1770-100, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: The Reporting Entity, on March 11, 2010.

The release of the exposure draft is just the latest stage in the joint project to revise the model for accounting standards. The draft will be out for comment until July 16.

The proposed statement of financial accounting concepts includes draft guidance that defines a reporting entity, the concept of control, and the purpose of consolidated financial statements.

According to the draft, an entity that controls other entities should consolidate the financial activities of the other enterprises in its results.

Concepts statements are not considered authoritative guidance, according to FASB ASC 105-10-05, formerly SFAS No. 168. But the FASB said it "expects to reconsider the authoritative status of the FASB concepts statements at completion of the conceptual framework project."

The review may elevate the status of the statements to authoritative guidance.

03/10/10 -- FASB and IASB to Hold Joint Meeting on Financial Instruments Projects
As discussed in the article entitled "Boards to Hold Joint Meeting on Financial Instruments Projects" in the March 8, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB will hold a joint meeting on March 11 to discuss several items related to the financial instruments with characteristics of equity project.

The boards are scheduled to discuss several items connected with this project, including economic compulsion, accounting requirements for settlement, conversion, expiration and modification of an instrument, and disclosure requirements.

The FASB issued Preliminary Views (PV) No. 1550-100, Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity, in November 2007. The draft calls for using the basic ownership approach to classify certain financial instruments as equity if they are both the most subordinated interest in an entity and they entitle the holder to a share of the entity’s net assets after all higher priority claims have been satisfied.

The boards tentatively plan to publish an exposure draft in the second quarter of 2010. During their February 18 meeting, the boards decided that instruments currently accounted for under IFRS 2, Share-based Payment, and FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, formerly SFAS No. 123(R), are not within the scope of this project. The FASB issued Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. EITF090J Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).

02/24/10 -- FEI Asks FASB and IASB for Common Effective Date for All MOU Projects
As discussed in the article entitled "FEI Asks for Common Effective Date for All MOU Projects" in the February 22, 2010, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, Financial Executives International wants the FASB and IASB to set a common effective date for the converged guidance they produce from their September 2008 Memorandum of Understanding.

In a February 12 letter to IASB Chairman Sir David Tweedie and FASB Chairman Robert Herz, Arnold Hanish, the head of FEI's committee on corporate reporting, wrote that the standards should have a common effective date because they are interdependent. He recommended that the boards provide a three-year implementation period, allow for early adoption, and give financial statement preparers as much flexibility as possible in choosing the manner of initial adoption.

"Our members identified financial statement presentation, leases, and pensions as the most impactful standards due to the level of systems and business process changes that will be required to implement the standards," Hanish wrote. FEI members said an effective date on a standard that precedes the effective date of a related standard would "drive inefficiencies as preparers would need to rework the design of business processes and systems."

In a separate letter, Hanish wrote that FEI would assist the IASB and FASB with the MOU projects, which present a "multitude of potential challenges" for the boards as they communicate information to constituents about changes to accounting standards.

10/28/09 -- IASB Panel Will Review FASB Impairment Model
As discussed in the article entitled "IASB Panel Will Review FASB Impairment Model" in the October 27, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the IASB and FASB recently decided at a joint meeting that the expert advisory panel that the IASB is forming to help it with a proposed impairment model for the standard to replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, will also review the FASB's proposed model.

The panel will advise the boards on how the expected cash flow approach the IASB will release in an exposure draft (ED) by the end of October compares to the credit impairment model the FASB is considering for its draft that will be released in the first quarter of 2010. The two boards want to come up with a converged standard and are working together, but they are producing exposure drafts independent of one another.

The IASB, which is accepting applications for the panel until November 5, plans to form the body after it releases the impairment ED, which will be available for comment until June 2010. The panel will assist in organizing and running field testing of the boards' proposed guidance to identify and resolve operational issues as they develop.

After the panel is done field testing the impairment model, the boards will have individual votes on which impairment model is more operational, as part of a joint work plan.

The work plan also includes recommendations for the boards to:

  • Discuss the hedging portion of the project in November and December; and
  • Address differences between the definitions of what items are presented in net income and other comprehensive income (OCI) for the classification and measurement portion of the project.

07/27/09 -- FASB and IASB Seek Industry Views on Feasibility of a Single Model for Revenue Recognition
As discussed in the article entitled "Industry Views Are Being Sought on Feasibility of a Single Model for Revenue Recognition" in the July 24, 2009, issue of Accounting & Compliance Alert, the FASB and IASB want more advice from specific industries before they decide whether the direction of their revenue recognition project is sound.

The decision, which was reached when the boards met July 23 at the IASB's London office, followed a review of the comments received in response to the December 2008 Discussion Paper (DP) No. 1660-100, Preliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customers. The proposal received 211 comments, the majority of which were from financial statement preparers.

The standard-setters want to develop a single revenue recognition model to replace a complex tapestry of industry-specific rules. The model in the discussion paper is based on the transfer of goods and services to customers.

Many of the letters agreed on the need for a single revenue recognition model for U.S. GAAP and IFRS, although some had questions about the feasibility of a single model. They raised concerns about how control would be interpreted by particular industries.

Back to Top

For a complete listing of WG&L SEC and GAAP Compliance products, as well as additional Financial Reporting & Management Research tools, please visit our online store.

Continue to monitor SEC/GAAP Watch for additional articles highlighting timely developments and practical guidance on important SEC, FASB, AICPA, PCAOB, GASB and IASB activity.

 

Home  |   FAQ  |   Site Map   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement   |  
For Sales please call 1-800-950-1216 or locate your local representative.
©2010 Thomson Reuters/RIA
[B-B02]
|clientip=38.107.191.103|
Writing to log file.